Question: What is Enlightenment?

Thanks for wondering the issues which come to the mind, even though they appear "somewhat peculiar" to you. In Enlightenment all observed pain has vanished, for what but wrong-mindedness appeared to create the misperception named pain.

Suffering was the illusion that Christ can keep a Warm Creator's Mind. "If suffering is true there's no God. If Lord is true there is number pain."(W-190.3) The latter holds true because God does not have a course in miracles any opposite. Enlightenment entails number pain or displeasure about ANYTHING, for Enlightenment is Genuine, Regular Pleasure, Peace, Flexibility, and Joy. Being Continuous, Enlightenment understands not of change. The impression of weakness and varying feelings moved as well. There's number pride to drop "back into." Nature Abides in delicate Love. All pain is over Today and nothing remains but a blessing of Stillness.

The Sacred Spirit is the note that Living is Eternal. The Provide Moment is the gateway to Eternity. The entire world of images was a full world of illusion. Images are therefore natural to the Sacred Spirit. They were "neutralized" the quick they did actually arise.

What does that suggest in terms of your second problem? You cannot destroy what has never existed, and in the Sacred Spirit's Perception of forgiveness harm is impossible. Bodies were never created and never die since the planet of pictures could be the past. It's impossible to get beginnings and endings in a program that is previously prepared and around extended ago. There is no life in images. This is actually the meaning of "Hold number graven photographs before the Lord Thy God." All photos were designed to unknown the Truth from understanding, and they are able to only be understood as one illusion. If illusions might be separated up in to living and lifeless, natural and inorganic, animate and inanimate Enlightenment will be impossible. For what's Enlightenment but Genuine Oneness, far beyond the chance of division of any sort? The split mind was the illusion. Find not to project the split brain to types and contact some types living and some types dead. Lord understands maybe not form. The separate brain seemed to be the "killer" illusion, the Sacred Soul reminds the sleeping mind that what is whole and unified cannot BE split. In Paradise Mind is One Spirit, and actually regarding this world forgiveness reflects this Oneness. The forgiven world realizes the unity of the relieved mind and sees that there's nothing "outside" of this simple mind which desires softly a pleased, mild dream. The target of ACIM is always to desire gently of a sinless world. This purpose is a lot more than possible, it's certain!

As for my seeming diet, "eat what's served" could be the Guidance I was given from the Sacred Spirit many years ago. Join along with your brother and allow number concept come between the Love you share. That Guidance has not changed. "Dinner" is always a history for sharing the Delight of the Residing Moment. What the planet calls "breathing" and "eating" and "drinking" and "sleeping" are actually the same in the Enlightened State. The Relieved Perspective considers the sameness of all things because each of them reveal the same Function: forgiveness. That Perspective isn't "particular," for in specific belief nothing is personal. Lord is no respecter of persons. I virtually cannot "take" an animal's "life" because Life is Spirit and can only just be lengthy or Provided as Lord Gives. "Take" has no indicating in my brain and since creatures haven't "lived" it's difficult that they may "die." The opinion indicated in the thought "individually get an animal's life" has several underlying assumptions which can be false. In right-mindedness it is evident that some ideas are increased because they are given out or provided, and "taking" a "life" or anything at all does not have any meaning. All that I provide is given to mySelf, and in offering there is number loss, no lose, and nothing is actually recinded from wholeness and unity. The teacher of God does not need anything that can't be provided away. Such may be the Pleasure of miracles! The idea vegetables seem to be flung every-where, yet there's never a good view back again to see where the vegetables land. The vegetables are never for an "different," and because providing and getting are exactly the same the mind gets the presents it gives. This is really the food you find for within the ego's questions.

The sole issue that require be asked is really a issue that is not necessarily ridiculous at all: Am I ready to know that God's Can and My Own will be the Same? God's May for Me is for Ideal Happiness. And what but that May could be the Will of Christ? Fortunately, nothing can alter Timeless Love. Thank You Lord!