Good sense and a knowledge of U.S. Constitutional Law informs me that if what the NSA was doing was constitutional and essential to the safety of the republic, Congress and the American public would have currently known about it. One of many significant hallmarks of a tyrannically repressive government is its clandestine acquisition, and use, of personal details about people in order to have manipulative levers with which to manage their behaviors. The 4th Amendment of the Bill of Rights claims, in text:

"The best of the people to be protected in their individuals, properties, documents, and results, against silly حفاظت فیزیکی به چه معناست queries and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants can issue, but upon probable trigger, supported by Pledge or affirmation, and especially describing the place to be searched, and the people or things to be seized."

Therefore, if the 4th Amendment could possibly be almost re-phrased in gentle of the personal documents and effects of individuals in the 21st Century pc era, because the usage of typewriters, cursive publishing, and making on paper have now been generally replaced by the electric documents of computer word processors, it may possibly be as the next:

"The best of the folks to be secure within their people, properties, papers (encompassing all traditional articles by pen, pen, and typewriter, and electric copies of most given e-mails, all electronic copies of manuscripts, and letters) and physical and electronic effects, against silly search and seizures, shan't be violated... "